The Project 101 Q&As

    Why is the work needed?

    The original Public Works buildings were constructed in the 1960’s and evolved as Nanaimo’s population grew from less than 45,000 in 1980 to over 100,000 in 2021.  

    The fleet maintenance building is past it’s useful life, not seismically safe and the mechanic bays are too small to fit some fleet vehicles including the largest of the City's fire and sanitation trucks.  

    The crew and administration building is also too small to accommodate current staff. Much of the additional space was added using temporary buildings, like construction trailers, which are not intended for permanent use and have outlived their useful life. Also, it isn’t seismically safe. 

    A lot of effort has been made to keep up with the growing needs of the community by converting unsuitable spaces or adding additional trailer units to create more room to work. The overall result are buildings that struggle or fail to meet operational needs, environmental regulations, as well as building code, accessibility and gender equity considerations.  

    Have you done any assessments to determine what the actual need is?

    Yes, numerous condition assessments and space needs assessments have been conducted and a value management exercise has been completed looking at actual requirement, logistics and seeking the best overall use of the site 

    Public Works Yard Condition Assessment 

    What other options were considered instead of what is proposed?

    We looked at a number of options including:

    • Purchase or lease an existing building elsewhere.
      • We could not find a suitable site.
    • Relocate to a new site.
      • This option would have been more expensive and there isn't much land that meets the operational needs.
    • Renovate the existing buildings in the Public Works yard. 
      • Some buildings are suitable for renovation such as the Purchasing, Stores and Truck Barn building and the plan is to renovate them. Others, like the fleet maintenance and crew and administration buildings are not suitable because it would cost more to renovate them than to rebuild or, in the case of the administrative building, they have portable buildings connected that can't be renovated and are already past their usable life. 

    Why aren't there detailed drawings for the project?

    The detailed design phase is part of the project and as we have not received approval from electors to borrow the funding, we cannot move onto design. If we receive approval to borrow the funds, we will begin detailed design with our architect.   

    If approved, what are the next steps? Has a contractor already been hired?

    If we receive approval to borrow the funds, we will begin detailed design with our architect, and then start engaging with contractors.  

    We have not hired a contractor for the project because we have not received approval to borrow the funding. This is also the reason for not having detailed plan drawings – the funding for that is included in the borrowing. 

    Is the project just to make the buildings earthquake-proof? If so, why not just do seismic upgrades?

    The project is to replace the fleet maintenance and administration buildings at the Public Works yard and have Public Works and Parks Operations work out of one site. These buildings were identified as priorities for replacement as they are not seismically safe and, in the case of the administrative building, the portable buildings attached cannot be retrofitted. Even if we were to do seismic upgrades, we would still be left with buildings that do not meet the basic requirements needed for them to be functional. 

    Were seismic studies done on the buildings in the Public Works yard?

    We have had seismic assessments done on the buildings in the Public Works yard as well as the Parks Operations locations (the goal is to eventually combine public works and parks operations into one location) and they were conducted by an independent engineering firm.  

    Due to the seismic assessment, the fleet maintenance building (mechanic shop) is the highest priority in risk to staff. Not only does this place our employees at risk but losing the shop impacts the day-to-day services the City provides. In the event of any emergency, City crews will be front line in rebuilding, repairing and restoring the community's infrastructure.

    Why make post-disaster rated buildings, what is the additional cost for that?

    Public Works is the fourth emergency responder, and it is crucial for them to be able to respond in a ‘post-disaster’ situation. A recent example of Public Works responding to an emergency is during the December 2018 windstorm. A number of trees, power lines and power poles were brought down by the wind over many of Nanaimo’s roads making them impassable. Public Works crews were there to clear the roads so that emergency vehicles could pass and BC Hydro crews could get in to restore power.  

    The fleet building needs to withstand a large earthquake so vehicles that are responding to the emergency such as fire trucks and vehicles that are there to clean up and rebuild during and after an emergency can be maintained 

    The additional cost to make these two buildings post-disaster rated has been forecast at less than 1.5% of the cost of the project. 

Financing 101 Q&As

    How much is this going to cost me?

    The City is looking to borrow up to $90 million for this project but will only borrow enough to cover anticipated costs each year as the project progresses. Property taxes will be adjusted each year for borrowing costs. Once the borrowing is complete, and should the full amount be borrowed, the cost for the typical Nanaimo home would be $139/year or $18 per $100,000 of assessed value. 

    (For a typical home valued at $783,808. Based on 2024 figures and a 20 year amortization of 4.58%. Figures have been rounded to the nearest dollar.) 

    Will the full amount be borrowed?

    We will only borrow what is required to complete this project. The maximum borrowing amount includes a large contingency for inflation, unforeseen construction challenges, volatile market conditions and other factors which have been included to protect the City from risk. 

    Why can’t you use reserves to fund this project?

    In short, funding from the City’s reserves has been allocated to other planned projects in the City’s long term project plan. Council chose to use borrowing for this project as this was the recommendation from the 20 Year Investment Plan Update.  

     The investment needed to maintain existing assets combined with the ongoing needs of a growing community, both physical and in terms of livability, can be significant. Reserves provide the largest funding source for projects and the City has a Reserve Policy that governs the development, maintenance and use of the reserves including the requirement of minimum reserve balances where appropriate.   

    The 20 Year Investment Plan and Asset Management Plan Update presented to Council in June 2023 projected investment over the next twenty years of $2.6 billion, a $999.1 million funding shortfall and an estimated replacement cost of the City’s infrastructure of $4.8 billion (2021).  

    The City’s reserves are not sufficient to fund all planned projects over the next twenty years.  To ensure needed projects can move forward recommendations to address the funding gap were presented which included funding several major capital projects from borrowing subject to Council and electoral approval this included the Public Works Yard Upgrades Project 

    Major projects that will benefit future residents are good candidates for borrowing based on the assumption that since future residents will benefit from the projects, they should share in the costs by paying the debt servicing costs through future property taxes 

    Additional information is available below: 

    20 Year Investment Plan and Asset Management Plan Update  

    Why can’t you put last year’s surplus towards this project? What is the difference between annual and accumulated surplus?

    The City’s annual surplus is never large enough to fully fund a project of this scope.  

    There are two types of surplus – annual and accumulated – and both have limitations around what they can be used for.  

    Local Governments in BC are legally not allowed to carry a deficit so will often have an annual surplus. Our reserve policy requires us to first use the annual surplus to top up any reserves that have fallen below their minimum required balance.  Any remaining surplus is allocated as per discussions with Council. Examples of how funds have been allocated in the past include funding the City’s Asset Retirement Obligations and distributing funds to the Property Acquisition Reserve to fund future property purchases.  

    The “accumulated surplus” is the total amount of the City’s assets, both financial and non-financial, less any liabilities. When looking at the City’s Financial Statements this is a big number ($1,008,279,462 at December 31, 2023, to be exact), The “accumulated surplus” is made up of three components – Operating Reserves, Statutory Reserves and Investments in Tangible Capital Assets. Here’s what each means: 

    Investments in tangible capital assets  

    Tangible capital assets are the diverse infrastructure owned by the City such as land, roads, recreation centres, fire trucks, sewer and water systems, etc. The investment in tangible capital assets is calculated as the net book value of the City’s tangible capital assets (cost less accumulated depreciation) less any capital debt (debt incurred to build or purchase a tangible capital asset).   

    At $813,686,224, this makes up 81 per cent of the City’s accumulated surplus and cannot be used as a funding source because they are a physical asset, not actual liquid cash.  

    Operating and Statutory Reserves 

    The City has a reserve policy that governs how reserves are built up and allocated. The policy also requires a minimum balance be maintained in certain reserves to help make sure the City has the financial resources available to respond to unanticipated events including the early or unanticipated failure of an asset.   

    For example, in November 2022, the Nanaimo Aquatic Centre (NAC) experienced a failure with their boilers. Funding was allocated from the Facility Development Reserve to allow for two new boilers to be ordered and installed in a timely manner. 

    When putting together the budget each year, the City’s 10 Year Project Plan is updated. Reserves are a major funding source for the project plan.   

    Requirements for using funds from reserves for projects includes making sure reserves are used for their intended purposes and that funds are distributed among the variety of projects required to maintain City services. 

    A significant portion of the reserves have been allocated to fund projects in the next ten years.  

    The City’s Operating Reserves make up 9 per cent or $90,050,776 of the accumulated surplus. 

    Statutory reserves are established by a bylaw and may only be used for the specific purpose for which the funds were collected.    

    For example, the Community Works Reserve can only be used for projects that meet the criteria of the program under which the funding was allocated to the City. Another example is the Equipment Depreciation Reserve which is for the replacement of the City’s fleet from cars and pickup trucks to ice resurfacers (a.k.a. “Zambonis”) and fire trucks. 

    The City’s Statutory Reserves make up 10 per cent or $104,542,462 of the accumulated surplus. 

    How much debt does the City currently have?

    The City currently has low debt levels, at December 31, 2023, the City had outstanding external borrowing of $38.2 million. The table below provides a breakdown of the amount, how the debt servicing (principal and interest payments) is being funded and when the debt will be repaid. 

    Asset
    Total Borrowed
    Outstanding Balance at Dec. 31, 2023
    Year Borrowing Will Be Repaid
    Funding Source for Debt Servicing
    Fire Station #1$16,675,623$14,862,8072038/2040/2041/2042General Asset Management Reserve Fund
    Fire Station #43,750,000999,3252027Property Taxation
    Sanitation1,698,8991,389,1192025/2028Sanitation User Fees
    VICC30,000,0007,051,0372026/2027Property Taxation
    Water Treatment Plant22,500,00013,868,0482033/2034Water User Fees

    $74,624,522$38,170,336

    In 2020 the debt for the Nanaimo Aquatic Centre (NAC) was fully repaid. 

     If property taxes are increased one per cent per year for contribution to the General Asset Management Reserve Fund why can’t this reserve, fund the project? What is the purpose of this reserve?

    There is not enough funding available in the reserve to fund this project and other needed infrastructure renewal projects. This reserve also funds the debt servicing costs for the replacement of Fire Station #1.  

    The General Asset Management Reserve helps fund the renewal of drainage, transportation, park amenities, facilities and IT equipment that have a replacement value of $2.4 billion (2021), as well it helps funds the City’s portion of transportation, drainage and parks growth projects related to development (DCC projects).  

    This reserve is one that has a required minimum balance ($6.1 million in this case), which helps ensure the City has funding available to react in a timely manner to issues that may emerge during the year. The reserve’s opening balance for 2024 is $21.0 million, the 2024 contribution from property taxes is $12.6 million and the projected closing balance for 2024 is $13.9 million.   

AAP 101 Q&As

    What is this AAP about?

    The AAP is to seek approval of electors to borrow funds (up to $90 million) for the construction of the Public Works Yard Updates Project, which involves replacing the fleet maintenance and crew and administration buildings. If you are an eligible elector and are opposed to the City borrowing funds for the Public Works Yard Updates Project, you may complete, sign and submit an elector response form by the deadline. If you are in favour of the City borrowing the funding for this project, no action is required.   

    Why an AAP and not a Referendum?

    In July, City Council chose to use an AAP to seek elector approval to borrow up to $90 million for the construction of the Public Works Yard Updates ProjectAn AAP gives eligible electors at least 30 days to submit their response form noting their opposition to the borrowing instead of having to appear on one of three designated dates to express their opinion, as they would in a referendum. The timeline approved by Council for the Public Works Yard Updates AAP provides 42 days for electors to respond (an additional 12 days beyond what is legislatively required). If more than 10 per cent of eligible electors submit a response form in opposition, Council must either abandon the bylaw or hold a referendum to obtain approval.    

    How was 10 per cent of eligible electors determined?

    Here is how it is calculated:

    Electors from the 2022 Municipal Election
    76,522

    +
    New Registered Electors since last Election
    697

    +
    Non-Resident Property Electors from the 2022 Municipal Election
    82

    =

    77,301

    x
    Estimated growth rate of the City of Nanaimo (1.8% based on census data) and 21 months of growth since the last election divided by 12 months in a year. 

    1.8% x 21 months of growth/12 months


    =
    Estimated New Electors since 2022 Municipal Election
    2434.9815 

    + 77,301

    =
    Fair Determination of Electors for 2024 Alternative Approval Process

    79,735.9815 (rounded to 79,736)  


    X 10%
    10% of eligible electors7,974

    What is the difference between an municipal election, a referendum and an alternative approval process?

    There are notable differences between these three types of participation in the democratic process at the municipal level such as voting methods and what is being voted on. But there are similarities too like how electors are notified. Have a look below for a comparison of elections, referendums and AAPs.  


    Municipal Election
    Referendum
    Alternative Approval Process
    Method of engagement (voting)Candidates for a given office are listed on a ballot.“Yes” or “No” question on a ballot.Mail/drop-off response form.
    Timeframe for electors to submit (vote)

    General voting day plus two advance voting days.

    (Section 107 Local Government Act (LGA) and “General Election Bylaw 2011 No. 7129”)
    Same requirements as an Election.
    Minimum 30 days.
    Eligibility of Electors (Voters)

    Must be a Registered Resident Elector or Registered Non-Resident Property Elector (NRPE).

    (Sections 65 and 66 LGA)
    Same requirements as an Election.
    Resident Electors and NRPE are eligible if they meet the requirements listed on the Response Form.
    Method of determining results.
    The majority of ballots cast by registered eligible electors determine the successful candidate for a given office.

    Elector approval if majority of votes (50% +1) counted are in favour.

    (Section 171 LGA)

    Elector approval obtained if the number of elector response forms received is less than 10% of eligible electors. 

    (Section 86 Community Charter)
    Official Notice Requirement

    Notice must be published in the public notices posting place and either in a locally circulated newspaper each week for two consecutive weeks or in accordance with a bylaw to provide for alternative means of publication. 

    (Section 94 Community Charter) 

    Same requirements as an Election.
    Same requirements as an Election.

    Does the City have to deliver notifications to all residents for a referendum?

    No, the notification rules are the same for a referendum as they are for an AAP. However, the City typically does more than just post official notices. We also provide information on our social media channels, website, weekly enewsletter, My Nanaimo This Week, and through open houses. For this AAP, we have also increased advertising in the newspaper, online and on local radio, provided information stations in City rec centres and the Service and Resource Centre and Council chose to mail out information to residents. 

     I submitted an opposition form for the previous AAP held in January this year. I am still opposed to the borrowing for this project, do I need to submit another response form this time?

    The funding and bylaw for this AAP is different than the previous one (which was cancelled due to an error and declared null and void) so a new form will need to be completed and submitted 

    Do I need to respond if I’m in favour of the borrowing?

    You only need to submit a response form if you are opposed to borrowing.

    Can the AAP be cancelled while it is in progress and just move to a referendum?

    According to Provincial guidelinesonce an AAP has begun, it must be completed, unless there is an error in the way the AAP is run).  

    What happens if the AAP fails?

    Should 10% of the electors submit forms petitioning against the borrowing, Council will have a decision to make. It would not automatically go to a referendum. Council would have to choose this if they still want to fund the project via borrowing. Council could choose to send the borrowing bylaw to a referendum, stop the project or fund it in alternate ways (taxation in one year, a couple of years, etc.).